philosoraptor42: (Default)


Hitchens has decided to get very upset about the portrayal of history in "The King's Speech". Now complaining about bad history in a movie is pretty common. Goodness knows that Oscar-winners "Gladiator" and "Braveheart" didn't worry one bit about their complete lack of historical accuracy. Oscar nominee "Elizabeth" was another one that made some big mistakes (with Elizabeth's love interest being randomly turned into a Catholic traitor).

Christopher Hitchens argues that this is serious business because it's propaganda. Propaganda for what though?

What follows might be spoilery for people who haven't yet seen "The King's Speech" so you've been warned. Anyway....

Read more... )
philosoraptor42: (Default)
Considering a number of articles here.

First an article by Khaled Diab entitled "The Muslim Faithless" considers Salman Rushdie's novel 'The Satanic Verses' 18 years later than its original release. It also considers the outrages over the Danish cartoons which puts it about 2 years overdue for that too. Nevertheless Diab makes a good point about the kind of mentality behind the protests by Muslims against both Rushdie's book and the Danish cartoons:

"But, like other examples of book burnings - and cartoon rage - throughout history, the fury had little to do with Rushdie or his book, since none of the angry mobs have ever actually read it. It is a reaction to western hegemony, socio-economic stagnation, poverty, dictatorship and the slow death of the modern Muslim secular dream."

Profile

philosoraptor42: (Default)
philosoraptor42

August 2014

S M T W T F S
     12
345 67 8 9
10 1112 13 141516
171819 202122 23
24 2526 2728 29 30
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 04:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios